Sunday, January 29, 2006
On the eve of the State of the Union address, the New York Times editorial board Sunday morning fired a booming shot over President Bush’s bow regarding his ongoing defense of his administration’s domestic spying campaign. The piece comes as close as anything I’ve seen this week to addressing the alarming arrogance and ignorance of the following briefing-room tap dance, which Sam (but no one else in the liberal blogosphere, apparently) caught last week. From Thursday’s presidential press conference:
Nice save, Sam. And it’s nice to see the Times throwing down again, too.Q: Mr. President, though — this is a direct follow up to that — the FISA law was implemented in 1978 in part because of revelations that the National Security Agency was spying domestically. What is wrong with that law if you feel you have to circumvent it and, as you just admitted, expand presidential power?
THE PRESIDENT: May I — if I might, you said that I have to circumvent it. There — wait a minute. That’s a — there’s something — it’s like saying, you know, you’re breaking the law. I’m not. See, that’s what you’ve got to understand. I am upholding my duty, and at the same time, doing so under the law and with the Constitution behind me. That’s just very important for you to understand.
Secondly, the FISA law was written in 1978. We’re having this discussion in 2006. It’s a different world. And FISA is still an important tool. It’s an important tool. And we still use that tool. But also — and we — look — I said, look, is it possible to conduct this program under the old law? And people said, it doesn’t work in order to be able to do the job we expect us to do.
And so that’s why I made the decision I made. And you know, “circumventing” is a loaded word, and I refuse to accept it, because I believe what I’m doing is legally right.
